April 2016 Bar Bulletin
Loading
 
Skip Navigation Links
CLE / Education
For Lawyers
Judicial
Legal Help
Membership
Special Programs
YLD
 
MyKCBA Login


April 2016 Bar Bulletin

EEOC Announces New Employer Pay Data Reporting Requirements

By Patrick Pearce

 

On January 29, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced the agency’s intent to require a new obligation for employers with at least 100 employees to submit data on wages earned and hours worked to the agency in annual reports.1 The intent of the new requirement is to make it easier for the EEOC to identify possible pay discrimination issues and assist employers in efforts to provide equal pay for employees.

The EEOC’s announcement would mean revisions to the Employer Information Report (EEO-1) already submitted by some private employers annually.2 The report has historically collected information on employee ethnicity, race and sex by job category.3 The reporting obligation has previously depended on the number of employees and whether the employer works on federal contracts.4

Since 1966, private employers with at least 100 employees, and employers performing federal contracts and that have at least 50 employees, have been required to submit the EEO-1 report annually. Small private employers with fewer than 50 employees have not been required to submit information regardless of whether they work on federal contracts.

Under the anticipated changes, employers, including federal contractors with at least 100 employees, will be required to report pay data on earnings and hours worked along with the previously required EEO-1 information on ethnicity, race and sex. Employers that are federal contractors and have 50–99 employees, and employers that do not perform federal contracts but have 99 or fewer employees, will be free of EEO-1 reporting obligations.

If the proposed changes go into effect, employers will need to collect and report on employee earnings as measured by W-2 information for a 12-month period as measured between July 1 and September 30. The employer will be able to select the 12-month period within that window. For example, an employer may choose to determine W-2 earnings as paid to employees in the 12-month period as measured back from the second pay period in July.

Along with W-2 earnings, employers will also need to report employee hours worked for all employees falling within the same pay range. The anticipation is that reporting hours worked within the same pay range will allow the EEOC to account for periods of time when employees are not working, such as part-time employees or employees who only worked for part of the 12-month period.

EEO-1 reporting currently identifies 10 job categories ranging from Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers to Service Workers. There are seven potential race and ethnicity groups. The proposed pay data requirement anticipates 12 pay bands. The proposed pay bands start at a low of $19,239 and under, and go to a high of $208,000 and over. As an example, an employer may be required to report that it has eight male Asian employees performing as Sales Workers, compensated in the sixth pay band, and who worked a total of 12,000 hours.

The full notice of the proposed revision to the EEO-1 is available online5 and comments could be submitted until April 1. The new requirements are expected to go into effect in 2017, with pay data to be included in the EEO-1 reporting by the September 30, 2017 filing deadline.

If the changes are put into effect this year as expected, the EEOC will post a notice on its official website and will provide an additional written notice to existing EEO-1 recipients of the changes and the need to submit pay data information during the 2017 EEO-1 information collection cycle. At present, the EEOC anticipates that because of the changes, EEO-1 information will not need to be reported until the 2017 cycle.

Going forward, there are several considerations for employers subject to reporting.

Establish a regular measurement date for W-2 wages paid. Consistency in determining the 12-month period measurement date will likely be the most effective and convenient way for employers to gather the pay data needed for reporting.

The window for assessment is relatively limited and, as noted above, must be measured using a date falling between July 1 and September 30 of the particular reporting year. It is likely that administratively the task of compiling the data across all employee pay bands will be most efficiently done using one consistent trigger date.

Anticipate the need to organize and properly report the data. The EEOC anticipates that most if not all employers subject to the reporting requirement will already have the anticipated pay data information available, and that employers may face a short term and possible costs to integrate all the data for reporting.

In anticipation of the first reporting period in 2017, it will likely be best to develop and put systems in place early to internally track and compile the necessary data.

Use the requirement as a risk management tool. The data sought by the EEOC can also be utilized internally by employers to identify whether disparities exist and, if so, the reasons for any disparities.

If disparities or unusual results are found, employers may wish to consult with counsel familiar with employment issues to determine whether legitimate business reasons exist to justify the results or to determine best options to address and fix a potential problem.


...login to read the rest of this article.


Return to Bar Bulletin Home Page

KCBA Twitter Logo KCBA Facebook Logo KCBA LinkedIn Logo KCBA Email Logo

King County Bar Association
1200 5th Ave, Suite 700
Seattle, WA 98101
Main (206) 267-7100
Fax (206) 267-7099

King County Bar Foundation Home Page

Charitable Arm of the Bar

Jewels Page

Pillars of the Bar Page


All rights reserved. All the content of this web site is copyrighted and may be reproduced in any form including digital and print
for any non-commercial purpose so long as this notice remains visible and attached hereto. View full Disclaimer.